Pokemon general chat: Pokemon for breakfast?
+22
Hanky Panky
Xaber
kotakun
Rozewolf
tinning3
phantasmalDexterity
Tirgo
PunchesMalone
Sandstriker
Druplesnubb
NinteNerd
d_what
Hytheter
OverlordJ
ilikeoctopus
muffinz
cephalopodAscendant
Spark Eletran
DicksMcgee
Dregadude
tailoredGoose
Gelatino
26 posters
Page 23 of 40
Page 23 of 40 • 1 ... 13 ... 22, 23, 24 ... 31 ... 40
Re: Pokemon general chat: Pokemon for breakfast?
i would probably pump a lot of that into nidoking, ampharos, absol, leavanny, ferrothorn, and the hitmons.
Hanky Panky- Admin
- Posts : 1258
Join date : 2013-07-27
Age : 34
Location : IT hell
Re: Pokemon general chat: Pokemon for breakfast?
...Ferrothorn? Explain plox. I'd probably boost the hitmons too only we're already spoilt for choice in the fighting department (likewise for water to be honest).
Absol with a boost would be great. Any boost. Any frigging kind of boost, at all. Graaaah why'd it have to be so cool and so generically shitty :/
Absol with a boost would be great. Any boost. Any frigging kind of boost, at all. Graaaah why'd it have to be so cool and so generically shitty :/
d_what- Democratically elected ruler of everything
- Posts : 2512
Join date : 2013-07-20
Age : 31
Location : Ireland
Re: Pokemon general chat: Pokemon for breakfast?
Aw man, I mess around with pokèmon stats all the time! If I'm bored and have nothing better to do, sometimes I'll just go to bulbapedia's list of pokèmon by base stats, open up a calculator(a physical one or one on the computer, either works), and start "revising" the stats of random things. It's a lot of fun! I don't really ever save any, let alone share them, but I guess I can post a few I've done here?
More possibly to come later, I guess.
- Spoiler:
- HP/Att/Def/SpA/SpD/Spe (BST)
Azumarill: 110/55/80/75/85/50 (455)
I've always been a little annoyed at how each (azu/ma)rill you catch has a 50/50 chance of being practically unable to hurt a fly, so this would make thick fat azumarill actually sort of okay while still keeping huge power the clearly superior option. Also added a little bit to HP and Attack just 'cause it could use a little boost there as well.
Delcatty: It's been turned into lopunny's version counterpart in BW2, so why not give them rearranged versions of the same stats?
Lopunny's normal stats: 65/76/84/54/96/105
Delcatty's revised stats: 96/84/76/54/65/105
(You know, I just realized how uncannily similar lopunny's stats are to meulin's in sburbmon. Look at them:
meulin: 100/76/84/74/90/110
lopunny: 65/76/84/54/96/105
That was totally a coincidence, I wasn't even trying to make them similar. I don't think I even knew lopunny's stats when I made meulin's.)
Chimecho: 75/50/85/95/95/85 (485)
Its stats were just so disappointingly generic for something so rare and cool-looking. It was decent, I guess, but so painfully average you had almost no reason to use it.
Relicanth: 100/100/125/75/65/55 (520)
That sp. attack was just toooo low! It was only catchable in the games where its only stab it gets good moves for was always special, too.
Kricketune: 85/105/60/85/60/75 (470)
Hey, it's my favorite pokèmon ever design-wise, how could I not? It's always been a little odd to me how something all about sound-based moves has such low sp. attack, and I've also always been a bit annoyed at how bad its stats are. It deserves better, right?
Whimsicott and lilligant: More version counterparts need to have the same stats but rearranged. Not because I think they need to be more related, no, I just think it's cool and want to see it more often.
Whimsicott: 65/67/80/87/79/112 (490)
___Lilligant: 79/65/67/112/80/87 (490)
The tynamo line: I don't think they're not good enough, no, I just think their stats could really fit them a bit better than they do.
Tynamo: 40/55/30/45/45/70 (285)
Eelektrik: 70/85/65/75/75/50 (420)
Eelektross: 85/115/75/95/95/60 (525)
Actually, if I ever was to make a hack of some sort that features unova pokèmon, I'd just remove tynamo from the line altogether. It doesn't really add anything to the evolution line other than making you wait too long to get something actually useful.
Cryogonal: 70/80/50/105/125/105 (535)
That defense was just way too low, man. I can see why, of course, and I know it shouldn't be good, but 30 is just a lot worse than it feels like it should be. The attack was too low too, I thought, for something clearly sharp-edged who learns a bunch of really cool physical attacks.
More possibly to come later, I guess.
muffinz- Gentleman
- Posts : 547
Join date : 2013-07-20
Age : 27
Location : hey, apparently i still exist
Re: Pokemon general chat: Pokemon for breakfast?
Muffinz, I can't check for every mons but I noticed that you reduced some of Whimsicotts stats, why is that? I though you were only supposed to add?
OverlordJ- Expert
- Posts : 2242
Join date : 2013-07-20
Age : 31
Location : Land of Cards and Games
Re: Pokemon general chat: Pokemon for breakfast?
Hey, I didn't do these for the thing dwhat mentioned, this is just something I do when I'm bored sometimes-- notice how I also I also edited some things' speed.
I never got why whimsicott's defense was its highest stat other than speed anyway.
I never got why whimsicott's defense was its highest stat other than speed anyway.
muffinz- Gentleman
- Posts : 547
Join date : 2013-07-20
Age : 27
Location : hey, apparently i still exist
Re: Pokemon general chat: Pokemon for breakfast?
muffinz wrote:Hey, I didn't do these for the thing dwhat mentioned, this is just something I do when I'm bored sometimes-- notice how I also I also edited some things' speed.
I never got why whimsicott's defense was its highest stat other than speed anyway.
Because Whimsicott is an awesome staller, with a combination of stun spore, Leech seed and Cotton Guard it rarely has to worry about physical moves. Back that up with Giga Drain and Whimsi can usually outlast most attackers. It's also great for set up, but that's a different point. So yeah, defense is the highest because it's a great staller.
OverlordJ- Expert
- Posts : 2242
Join date : 2013-07-20
Age : 31
Location : Land of Cards and Games
Re: Pokemon general chat: Pokemon for breakfast?
No, I didn't mean "why would it having good defense be useful", I meant "why did they decide it made sense for a cotton sheep thing to have good defense". Nothing about its design or its concept seems to suggest it'd be better at taking physical hits than doing damage. Good defense fits its role in battle, sure, but not its design, or its pokèdex entries, or whatever else about it.
muffinz- Gentleman
- Posts : 547
Join date : 2013-07-20
Age : 27
Location : hey, apparently i still exist
Re: Pokemon general chat: Pokemon for breakfast?
muffinz wrote:No, I didn't mean "why would it having good defense be useful", I meant "why did they decide it made sense for a cotton sheep thing to have good defense". Nothing about its design or its concept seems to suggest it'd be better at taking physical hits than doing damage. Good defense fits its role in battle, sure, but not its design, or its pokèdex entries, or whatever else about it.
Come ON! How does a tiny little thing sound like something that deals damage?
And think about it, it has a giant cottonball on it's back, of course it is able to take hits well. It's like it has a huge freaking pillow on it's back. Just imagine if someone tries to punch a huge pillow. Seriously, I rarely see a pokemon with stats so fitting like Whimsicott. It's light and floaty, which is why it's fast, it has a huge cottonball to protect it, so it got high defense. And it's other stats are okay at best, simply because it's actually only a small little thing, of course it doesn't have too much health or is too strong.
OverlordJ- Expert
- Posts : 2242
Join date : 2013-07-20
Age : 31
Location : Land of Cards and Games
Re: Pokemon general chat: Pokemon for breakfast?
It's a shock absorber! Like Snorlax. Problem solved.
But I really don't like editing speed. There are plenty of Pokemon who could use a new speed tier but that directly and completely screws over all the pokemon they jumped over. Concatenating the speed tiers I might be okay with, though. At least that way things that are fast can always be faster, even if it means timid and Max speed.
Also Grass types as of late have been forming their own niche; speedy walls i.e status throwers. Serperior, Whimsicott and Lilligant all do this. So that explains that anyway. Good for them!
But I really don't like editing speed. There are plenty of Pokemon who could use a new speed tier but that directly and completely screws over all the pokemon they jumped over. Concatenating the speed tiers I might be okay with, though. At least that way things that are fast can always be faster, even if it means timid and Max speed.
Also Grass types as of late have been forming their own niche; speedy walls i.e status throwers. Serperior, Whimsicott and Lilligant all do this. So that explains that anyway. Good for them!
d_what- Democratically elected ruler of everything
- Posts : 2512
Join date : 2013-07-20
Age : 31
Location : Ireland
Re: Pokemon general chat: Pokemon for breakfast?
Yo guys. Why the hell'd it take so long for me to find this place??
I'm gonna have to side with J on this one. Prankster Whimsicott is pretty much the most annoying Pokemon ever created. Ever.
(Except for maybe Quick Claw Dunsparce.)
I'm gonna have to side with J on this one. Prankster Whimsicott is pretty much the most annoying Pokemon ever created. Ever.
(Except for maybe Quick Claw Dunsparce.)
invisibleTerrarium- Tamer
- Posts : 1251
Join date : 2013-08-06
Age : 24
Location : yes
Re: Pokemon general chat: Pokemon for breakfast?
i dunno, poison heal gliscor is pretty damn bothersome
Last edited by Hanky Panky on Wed Aug 07, 2013 12:16 am; edited 1 time in total
Hanky Panky- Admin
- Posts : 1258
Join date : 2013-07-27
Age : 34
Location : IT hell
Re: Pokemon general chat: Pokemon for breakfast?
Yeah but Dunsparce can SERENE GRACE PARAFLINCH SPAM TO HELL AND BACK.
If we're going by competitive standards I find Shedinja to be annoying in Ubers.
If we're going by competitive standards I find Shedinja to be annoying in Ubers.
invisibleTerrarium- Tamer
- Posts : 1251
Join date : 2013-08-06
Age : 24
Location : yes
Re: Pokemon general chat: Pokemon for breakfast?
Is that because there aren't a lot of ubers that pack supereffective attacks, or what?
Hanky Panky- Admin
- Posts : 1258
Join date : 2013-07-27
Age : 34
Location : IT hell
Re: Pokemon general chat: Pokemon for breakfast?
what about the other side of annoying the ones that are great to use?
lets get the splash only whatever out of the way first though
lets get the splash only whatever out of the way first though
Re: Pokemon general chat: Pokemon for breakfast?
Wait wait wait
No one said Wobbuffet yet.
I am disappoint.
No one said Wobbuffet yet.
I am disappoint.
invisibleTerrarium- Tamer
- Posts : 1251
Join date : 2013-08-06
Age : 24
Location : yes
Re: Pokemon general chat: Pokemon for breakfast?
We were waiting foe you to say it
Hanky Panky- Admin
- Posts : 1258
Join date : 2013-07-27
Age : 34
Location : IT hell
Re: Pokemon general chat: Pokemon for breakfast?
I know the WORST argument in any competitive discussion is 'it's easy to take down if you have X' or 'I've never had trouble with it' but... I've never had trouble with Wobbuffet :F Set-Up sweepers (besides agility) slaughter it, as do phazers, or weaker guys with recovery, or anything with Toxic, yadda yadda... Though to be fair the point it it has shadow tag, which means the opponent should target Pokemon it can take down, I.e heavy offensive Pokemon. (Without SE moves.) And while I have battled many Wobbuffet, they've all been AI controlled so that element of targeting is gone. So yeah. Wobbuffet? Pretty annoying.
Except that Power Creep makes it situational to the point of being useless, and Team Preview hurts a lot, too.
Guys why is Dunsparse annoying but Togekiss isn't? Togekiss has better stats and STAB. Or did you forget about poor sweet precious Togekiss :/
Except that Power Creep makes it situational to the point of being useless, and Team Preview hurts a lot, too.
Guys why is Dunsparse annoying but Togekiss isn't? Togekiss has better stats and STAB. Or did you forget about poor sweet precious Togekiss :/
d_what- Democratically elected ruler of everything
- Posts : 2512
Join date : 2013-07-20
Age : 31
Location : Ireland
Re: Pokemon general chat: Pokemon for breakfast?
Yeah, Togekiss is more annoying than Dunsparce any day, really.
Then there's Jirachi, and Shaymin-S. You've got a decent amount of choice for your flinchhax.
Personally, I find Ferrothorn to be one of the mose irritating pokemon to play in competitive, given most SE attacks do about ~40% and then you take similar damage from Iron Barbs + Rocky Helmet + Leech Seed. Especially in rain (I mostly run weatherless teams), since it no longer has to worry about that fire weakness.
Then there's Jirachi, and Shaymin-S. You've got a decent amount of choice for your flinchhax.
Personally, I find Ferrothorn to be one of the mose irritating pokemon to play in competitive, given most SE attacks do about ~40% and then you take similar damage from Iron Barbs + Rocky Helmet + Leech Seed. Especially in rain (I mostly run weatherless teams), since it no longer has to worry about that fire weakness.
Xaber- Ranger
- Posts : 206
Join date : 2013-07-23
Age : 26
Location : Australia
Re: Pokemon general chat: Pokemon for breakfast?
Ferrothorn was one of my favorite gen 5 pokemon and i am so glad it's competitively viable. now i just have to breed/train one better than my in-game one.
Hanky Panky- Admin
- Posts : 1258
Join date : 2013-07-27
Age : 34
Location : IT hell
Re: Pokemon general chat: Pokemon for breakfast?
strong pokemon weak pokemon thats selfish to be skilled use your favorite ones like the ferrothorn you already have in game
Re: Pokemon general chat: Pokemon for breakfast?
you had me going for the first few words with the whole quoting karen thing but then you kind of went off-track and now im bored.
Hanky Panky- Admin
- Posts : 1258
Join date : 2013-07-27
Age : 34
Location : IT hell
Re: Pokemon general chat: Pokemon for breakfast?
but its only the first few words that matter after strong pokemon weak pokemon you could put anything and it would still work
strong pokemon weak pokemon go out there and do good with whatever you have
strong pokemon weak pokemon they are the same and smogons completely worthless
strong pokemon weak pokemon red pokemon blue pokemon
strong pokemon weak pokemon any questions
strong pokemon weak pokemon those are two distinct categories and you are so fucked if you use those in the latter
strong pokemon weak pokemon go out there and do good with whatever you have
strong pokemon weak pokemon they are the same and smogons completely worthless
strong pokemon weak pokemon red pokemon blue pokemon
strong pokemon weak pokemon any questions
strong pokemon weak pokemon those are two distinct categories and you are so fucked if you use those in the latter
Re: Pokemon general chat: Pokemon for breakfast?
kotakun wrote:strong pokemon weak pokemon thats selfish to be skilled use your favorite ones like the ferrothorn you already have in game
kotakun every time you post something sort of like this i have no idea whether you're being sincere or scornfully sarcastic
and just watch, you'll respond to this with something like "i am always sincere" and i'll have no idea if THAT post is sarcastic or not either
muffinz- Gentleman
- Posts : 547
Join date : 2013-07-20
Age : 27
Location : hey, apparently i still exist
Re: Pokemon general chat: Pokemon for breakfast?
hold on while i recover from my extreme surprise
oh wait nevermind that was gas
i am not the least bit surprised
Hanky Panky- Admin
- Posts : 1258
Join date : 2013-07-27
Age : 34
Location : IT hell
Page 23 of 40 • 1 ... 13 ... 22, 23, 24 ... 31 ... 40
Similar topics
» General chat: Who needs mspaf anyway
» General chat: Who needs mspaf anyway
» General chat: Who needs mspaf anyway
» General Chat: Dawn of THE FIRST DAY (72 hours remain)
» General Chat: The Smashening
» General chat: Who needs mspaf anyway
» General chat: Who needs mspaf anyway
» General Chat: Dawn of THE FIRST DAY (72 hours remain)
» General Chat: The Smashening
Page 23 of 40
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|